Councillors come out in support of pupil support

School crossing patrollers will also be safe as part of Argyll and Bute Council’s budget-setting process in February.

Want to read more?

We value our content and access to our full site is only available on subscription. Your subscription entitles you to 7-day-a-week access to our website, plus a full digital copy of that week’s paper to read on your pc/mac or mobile device In addition your subscription includes access to digital archive copies from 2006 onwards.

Already a subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Schools in and around Campbeltown will still benefit from pupil support assistants, despite the roles being touted as ‘savings options’ at Argyll and Bute Council’s policy and resources meeting in December.

Councillors have also decided that school crossing patrollers will be safe as part of Argyll and Bute Council’s budget-setting process in February – even though those posts were not explicitly mentioned in the most recent list of savings options.

A report which went before the December meeting showed that pupil support assistants were one of many savings options being proposed.

It was estimated that scrapping them would see 38 jobs lost, but councillors overseeing the budget process have confirmed that it will not be recommended.

However, the report did not explicitly mention school crossing patrollers, whose posts have been under scrutiny as part of the last two budgets. This savings option was not taken by the council on either occasion.

The authority will set its 2021/22 budget at a Skype meeting on Monday February 25.

The authority’s deputy leader, Helensburgh Central Conservative councillor Gary Mulvaney, who chairs the council’s budget working group, said: ‘The working group that we put in place to look at this year’s budget, which includes cross party members, unanimously agreed that potential savings around pupil support assistants and school crossing patrollers should not be taken.

‘Whilst the council will not finally consider its budget until the end of February, and there are undoubtedly still difficult long term decisions to be made to safeguard services within tight public finances, it made sense meantime to provide some re-assurance to those particular staff affected.’

Other savings options which were also listed for the policy and resources committee in December included streamlining the council’s property estate, reducing grass cutting services and holding more meetings virtually to cut down on councillors’ expenses.